People have long been aware, it seems, of the power of
music. Long ago we have philosophers such as Plato, expounding, in his work
about his new utopian republic, on what modes or scales were suitable and which
should be banned. He makes this rather fascinating statement about music in
general;
"The
introduction of novel fashions in music is a thing to beware of as endangering
the whole fabric of society, whose most important conventions are unsettled by
any revolutions in that
quarter."
--Plato, The Republic (c.428 B.C.-c.347 B.C.)
It brings to mind
Nazi Germany where the state controlled the art and it was all about the Arian
Race. Also brings to mind Russia, under Stalin, where the state ran the media
and a bad review could get you sent to a concentration camp or executed.
Dmitri Shostakovich was reputed to have slept downstairs
with his bags packed so that, when the secret police came to get him, he
wouldn’t wake up his family.
Now all of these are societies that could have used a little
unsettling of their most important conventions and I think that Plato,
unwittingly, hit the nail on the head as far as the definitions of what art and
music are.
I daresay there has not been a society whose most important
conventions did not need a little unsettling. Music and art are communication
and they are nothing if they don’t cause people to come out of their
conditioning and take a look at what is going on. When we used to study the
blues, in school, they said it was a musical form innovated by the black slaves
and was used to spread news. What news, we wondered? It was the news about the
reality of their situation.
The status quo, in time, becomes an enslaving trap. Music
should challenge the status quo. Music and art that doesn’t do this is, as Paul
Simon says, ‘the sound of silence.' And thanks to Plato for defining what music and art should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment